Search the Library

Objectives: To identify and value resources required to implement and sustain the Massachusetts model of office-based addiction treatment (MA Model) in the Primary Care Opioid Use Disorders Treatment trial (NCT03407638) using a nurse care manager (NCM) to support medication for opioid use disorder in primary care settings.

Study design: A site-specific microcosting analysis was conducted via activity-based costing. Guided by a structured costing instrument, we conducted semistructured interviews with relevant personnel and assigned nationally representative costs.

Methods: Data came from 6 health care systems. Costs were categorized as fixed start-up, time dependent, or variable and estimated as annual per-clinic and per-patient costs for implementation and sustainment phases.

Results: Mean implementation cost (ie, year 1 fixed start-up, time-dependent, and variable) was $238,888 per clinic ($3185 per patient); each subsequent year cost $229,676 ($3062 per patient), assuming 75 patients per month and 29% new patient case mix. Mean onetime fixed start-up costs were $9212 per clinic and included supplies and training. Time-dependent costs were $70,446 per clinic and included rent and meetings. Variable costs were $159,229 per clinic and included NCMs’ and prescribers’ clinical duties. On average, NCMs spent 1967.6 hours on MA Model-related work per year (26.2 hours per patient). In sensitivity analyses, costs varied drastically with patient caseload, provider mix, and new patient case mix.

Conclusions: Fixed start-up and time-dependent costs were minimal. Variable costs were 66.7% of implementation costs and 69.3% of costs annually afterward. The primary cost driver was NCM time conducting MA Model-related work. The additional value of the model will depend on associated downstream outcomes. These results may be helpful to health care systems considering implementing the MA Model.

Related protocols: CTN-0074

This is the primary outcomes article for CTN-0080-A-2. Introduction: Racial and ethnic inequities persist in medication treatment initiation and adherence for pregnant and postpartum people with opioid use disorder (OUD). Our objective was to understand the experiences of “positive outliers,” specifically pregnant and postpartum people of color with OUD who utilized medication treatment and engaged in a randomized clinical trial for buprenorphine despite historical, cultural, and structural barriers.

Methods: We conducted two sets of semi-structured qualitative interviews. First, trained peers with lived expertise as mothers in recovery interviewed individuals who identified with a non-white race and/or ethnicity and enrolled in the Medication Treatment for OUD in Expectant Mothers (MOMs) trial (NCT03918850). Second, we interviewed principal investigators, clinicians, and research coordinators from the 13 MOMs trial sites. We used an inductive thematic approach informed by the Social Ecological Model of Racism and Anti-Racism. Transcripts were double-coded and reviewed until consensus was reached. Preliminary findings from participant and staff interviews were merged and triangulated with peers to inform theme development.

Results: We completed 17 interviews with MOMs trial participants from 7 sites. Participants identified as Hispanic (29%), Black non-Hispanic (24%), multi-racial Hispanic (18%), multi-racial non-Hispanic (18%), and American Indian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander (12%). Thirty-two interviews with trial staff were also completed. Three themes emerged: (1) Although some participants expected racist treatment and research exploitation, all participants interviewed reported non-discriminatory, non-judgmental care within the MOMs trial; (2) Compassionate care, frequent, personalized, and integrated encounters, and emotional support helped counteract prior stigmatizing and discriminatory health care interactions, enabling participants of color to feel particularly supported, trusted, and empowered during the MOMs trial; and (3) Despite pervasive cultural stigma around addiction and concerns about taking an investigational drug while pregnant, participants expressed that pregnancy status, care team trust, and transparent communication with MOMs trial staff encouraged medication utilization and adherence.

Conclusion: Facilitators of successful engagement in the MOMs trial and retention in medication treatment among pregnant and postpartum people of color with OUD included non-judgmental care, sustained trust, and frequent contact. Key perinatal OUD clinical interventions and trial improvements include personalized communication and scheduling flexibility to promote engagement of marginalized populations.

Related protocols: CTN-0080-A-2

Background: Stigma toward people with substance use disorders (SUD) remains a major barrier to care. There have been multiple calls to action to address SUD stigma in healthcare settings and other reviews have clarified the need for more rigorous effectiveness research. In addition to attention to effectiveness research, there is a need to attend to the implementation strategies used to deliver SUD stigma reduction interventions. Delineating discrete implementation strategies that have been used to address stigma will support future research efforts to arrive at the most optimal interventions to address SUD stigma.

Methods: We searched three databases and extracted data to identify interventions tested to reduce SUD stigma. We used the adapted Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) taxonomy to characterize the discrete implementation strategies used to support the adoption, implementation, sustainment, and scale-up (or spread) of each intervention.

Results: This scoping review synthesized 108 peer-reviewed studies reporting on interventions which to address SUD stigma among healthcare professionals. Most interventions were implemented in training environments, including higher education and continuing education settings, and focused on providing basic education on SUD broadly or opioid use disorder. Within interventions, educational and training implementation strategies were most prominent with 74% of studies using educational meetings and 39% distributing training materials. Far fewer studies used implementation strategies that used experiential approaches such interactive assistance, simulation, case-based learning, or contact with people with lived experience. Most studies (73%) reported reductions in stigmatizing attitudes, most often immediately post-intervention, though the need for higher study quality was notable.

Conclusions: Existing stigma-reduction interventions are overwhelmingly education-focused and primarily implemented in academic settings, with limited use of strategies that promote reflective learning, contact-based engagement, or organizational change. Future work should employ more rigorous designs that systematically test implementation strategies to create packaged SUD stigma reduction interventions optimized for effectiveness and implementation.

Objectives: To estimate all-cause and cause-specific mortality burden in patients who received medication treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD).

Methods: We (the CTN Health Systems Node) conducted a cohort study of 27,230 patients who received medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), buprenorphine or naltrexone, matched 1:1 to individuals without MOUD from 4 US health systems in California, Colorado, and Michigan between 2012 and 2021. We calculated standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) with bootstrapped 95% CI to assess mortality burden.

Results: Patients who received treatment for OUD were 4 times more likely to die from any cause (SMR 4.37, 95% CI 3.80-4.64) and 37 times more likely to die from drug overdose (SMR 37.58, 95% CI 29.33-55.09; 41.6% of all deaths) compared to demographically similar individuals. Deaths from non-overdose causes showed modest but significant burden (SMR 2.68, 95% CI 2.31-2.86; 58.4% of deaths). The top contributors to non-overdose deaths were circulatory system diseases (SMR 3.06, 95% CI 1.73-3.63; 13.9% of deaths), other external causes (SMR 4.50, 95% CI 3.64-5.62; 11.3% of deaths), and cancers (SMR 1.59, 95% CI 1.30-1.86; 9.4% of deaths), which all showed elevated mortality.

Conclusions: Continued efforts are needed to prevent high burden of mortality from both overdose and non-overdose causes among patients with MOUD treatment.

Background: Rural communities face disproportionate rates of opioid use disorder (OUD) and overdose mortality but continue to be underrepresented in clinical research and underserved in access to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Structural barriers including shortages of qualified providers, transportation challenges, and stigma limit uptake of evidence-based treatment. To address these gaps, the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) launched two pragmatic trials focused exclusively on rural populations: CTN-0102, a telemedicine (TM) feasibility study connecting rural primary care patients to external MOUD providers, and CTN-0102XR (RXR), a pilot randomized trial evaluating extended-release buprenorphine (Brixadi®) compared to sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone.

Objective: The article aims to describe the implementation of these two rural pragmatic trials, identify challenges encountered in study implementation, and present lessons learned. We applied frameworks from implementation science, including the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC), to demonstrate how pragmatic trial implementation mirrors implementation of evidence-based programs and practices, and can benefit from established implementation frameworks and strategies.

Results: Across 13 rural clinics in 10 states, both trials demonstrated the feasibility of integrating MOUD into primary care settings through pragmatic study designs closely aligned with routine clinical workflows. Principal challenges included limited clinic research capacity, staff stigma toward OUD treatment, communication barriers between local clinics and external TM vendors, and variable digital access. Solutions included engaging local champions, co-developing workflows tailored to each clinic’s operations, simplifying technology requirements, and emphasizing bi-directional communication among clinic, research, and vendor teams. Continuous technical assistance and protocol flexibility and adaptation were crucial for sustaining engagement and aligning study procedures with clinical realities. Findings demonstrated that rural clinics can feasibly implement TM-based MOUD coordination and extended-release buprenorphine with adequate support and contextual adaptation.

Conclusions: Lessons from CTN-0102 and CTN-0102XR underscore that pragmatic trials in rural settings benefit from early contextual assessment, engagement of community stakeholders, adaptable protocols, and strong implementation support. Applying implementation science frameworks facilitates solutions to real-world barriers and enhances study sustainability. Future CTN efforts should continue to prioritize rural site inclusion, capacity building, and equitable access to evidence-based OUD treatment.

Related protocols: CTN-0102, CTN-0102-XR

Over the past two decades, the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Clinical Trials Network (CTN) has made major contributions to progress in substance use treatment research. However, contributions to research addressing the considerable medical and mental health comorbidities of substance use, which can impede treatment efficacy and compromise health, have been emphasized less. In this Commentary, we review the contributions of CTN studies focused on medical comorbidities, initially centered on the HIV epidemic in people who use drugs, and subsequently broadening to address hepatitis C and life-threatening bacterial infections; as well as mental health comorbidities, especially post-traumatic stress disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and suicidality. These studies demonstrate that comorbidities assessments and treatment can be feasibly implemented in substance use treatment programs and, conversely, that substance use assessments and treatments can be feasibly implemented in clinical care sites. We highlight the NIDA CTN Data Share as an invaluable resource for secondary analyses of comorbidities using data from CTN substance use treatment protocols and provide examples of its use. We describe the work of the CTN Comorbidities of Substance Use Special Interest Group (SIG), formerly known as the HIV SIG, as an example of the role that SIGs can play in facilitating CTN research in areas of emerging significance. We emphasize the importance of implementing a “whole person” approach—one that integrates both substance use and comorbidities outcomes. We identify promising opportunities for conducting this research by studying strategies for integrating prevention, screening, linkage, treatment, adherence, and retention support for comorbidities into substance use disorder (SUD) treatment venues; as well as strategies for integrating SUD treatment into primary care venues, hospitals, and other non-SUD clinical settings.

Adolescent substance use (SU) presents a distinct public health challenge, as this developmental stage carries heightened vulnerability for progression to problematic use. Early SU—before age 18—is a major risk factor for later Substance Use Disorders (SUD), with long-term neurobiological and psychosocial consequences. National surveillance data show a continued decline in alcohol and cigarette use, yet persistent concerns around cannabis (including synthetic variants) and sharp increases in vaping. The frequent occurrence of polysubstance use further complicates prevention and intervention efforts.

The intersection of SU and mental health conditions, such as anxiety and depression, compounds these challenges. The 2024 National Survey on Drug Use and Health data reveal that nearly one-third (27.9%) of adolescents aged 12–17 with both SUD and a Major Depressive Episode receive no treatment for either condition. Despite promising evidence-based interventions, their implementation remains limited, revealing a critical translational gap between research efficacy and real-world effectiveness.

To close this gap, the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) is leveraging its multi-site research infrastructure to conduct pragmatic clinical trials that emphasize the inclusion of adolescents from all backgrounds. The CTN’s agenda identifies six priorities to advance scalable, impactful solutions:

• Implementation Science and Real-World Effectiveness – embedding interventions into existing systems of care.
• Precision Medicine and Personalized Interventions – integrating biological, psychological, and social data to tailor treatments.
• Family and Environmental Contexts – expanding family-based and peer-supported models.
• Digital Innovations and Technology Integration – evaluating technology-assisted and AI-driven interventions.
• Longitudinal Outcomes and Lifespan Perspective – assessing developmental, academic, and quality-of-life outcomes over time.
• Community-Led and Co-Designed Research – engaging community partners and individuals with lived experience as co-researchers.

Through this coordinated agenda, the CTN aims to build an equitable, evidence-informed framework that bridges discovery and practice, drives innovation, and informs policies that foster resilient, healthy futures for adolescents nationwide.

The integration of data across randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing interventions and treatments for substance use disorder (SUD) offers a rich opportunity for improving the evidence base and analytic methods used in SUD research. With over 50 completed trials of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) available for secondary analysis and harmonization, the possibilities are extensive, but the effort to harmonize and document datasets demands complex analytic formulation and methodology. This commentary discusses strengths and challenges of data harmonization, sharing clinical and data science considerations based on four exemplar studies that harmonized data across multiple CTN trials. We offer recommendations for others planning data harmonization for secondary analysis, discuss guiding principles for research data management, outline suggestions to bridge gaps in the context of the CTN, and finally frame considerations for using state-of-the-art tools such as generative AI and integration of data from clinical trials and electronic health records to enhance the promise of data harmonization.

Introduction: Increases in morbidity and mortality associated with stimulant use disorders (StUDs) combined with limited pharmacological research and development highlight the need to explore repurposing existing medications with mechanisms of action relevant to the management of StUDs. This paper presents findings regarding a common set of symptoms common across StUDs, impulsivity and compulsivity, that offer compelling rationale to identify future interventions for evaluation in CTN trials and elsewhere.

Methods: A virtual Task Force meeting held in 2024 by the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) assembled national experts to consider pharmacological and non-pharmacological candidates for repurposing in StUD treatment. Discussion centered on evidence regarding their mechanisms of action, preclinical and clinical evidence in StUD management, and how these interventions could be further researched or applied in clinical practice.

Results: Discussions referenced medications including: suvorexant, GLP-1 agonists, guanfacine, clavulanic acid, cariprazine, cannabidiol and psychedelics. Non-medication therapeutic strategies to consider for managing StUDs include novel neuromodulation techniques (low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU), photobiomodulation (tPBM)), which are believed to precisely and deeply penetrate brain tissues, targeting areas responsible for StUDs-related behaviors.

Task Force findings with high enthusiasm for possible consideration as candidate medication options for future research based on novel strategies for StUDs include suvorexant and GLP-1R agonists. Findings with less enthusiasm, but with evidence-based rationale include cariprazine, clavulanic acide, and guanfacine. Findings noted strong rationale for the promise of new neuromodulation therapies; constraints of their time-consuming nature over through multiple sessions across several weeks are challenges.

Discussion: Task Force findings provide guidance for a possible pipeline of candidate therapeutic options for future research on novel strategies for treatment of StUDs. A cross-cutting theme emerged in recognition of heterogeneous behavioral phenotypes presenting challenges to recovery, suggesting that beyond understanding the mechanism of action and efficacy of each therapeutic strategy, it is important to pursue personalized medicine approaches to improve outcomes for StUDs.

Importance: Health plan disenrollment may interrupt treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) and overall care, increasing risk for serious outcomes, including overdose and death. There is limited evidence on the association of disenrollment with all-cause and overdose mortality after initiating medications for OUD (MOUD) treatment.

Objective: To assess the association of health plan disenrollment with all-cause and overdose mortality in patients treated with MOUD.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study conducted by the CTN Health Systems Node, included privately and publicly insured patients aged 16 years or older who initiated buprenorphine or naltrexone for OUD treatment between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2021, at 3 integrated health insurance and care delivery systems in 2 US states. Patients were followed up to 2 years until December 31, 2022. Data were analyzed July 2024 to November 2025.

Exposure: Health plan disenrollment following MOUD initiation.

Main outcomes and measures: All-cause mortality and drug-related and alcohol-related overdose mortality within 2 years of MOUD initiation ascertained from the National Death Index. Survival analyses were adjusted for patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

Results: Among 20,011 patients (mean [SD] age 38.7 [15.1] years; 12 299 males [61.5%]) who were treated for OUD, 6948 (34.7%) experienced disenrollment and 586 (2.9%) died during follow-up. The crude rate was 15.3 (95% CI, 14.1-16.6) per 1000 person-years for all-cause mortality and 6.2 (95% CI, 5.4-7.0) per 1000 person-years for overdose mortality. Ever experiencing disenrollment showed elevated all-cause mortality (17.6 [95% CI, 14.9-20.8] vs 14.7 [95% CI, 13.4-16.1] per 1000 person-years) and overdose mortality (8.9 [95% CI, 7.1-11.3] vs 5.4 [95% CI, 4.7-6.3] per 1000 person-years) relative to remaining enrolled. In adjusted analyses, ever experiencing disenrollment was associated with increased hazards of all-cause (hazard ratio [HR], 1.51; 95% CI, 1.23-1.84) and overdose mortality (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.17-2.09). Compared with remaining enrolled and receiving MOUD treatment, being disenrolled (HR, 4.34; 95% CI, 3.19-5.89) and being enrolled and not receiving MOUD treatment (HR, 4.19; 95% CI, 3.24-5.43) were associated with overall mortality.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of patients who initiated MOUD, experiencing health plan disenrollment was associated with increased mortality risk compared with remaining enrolled. Strategies are needed to improve continuity of health coverage and mitigate the elevated mortality risk during insurance transitions for patients receiving medications for OUD.

Background and aims: Despite similar substance use levels, Black adults experience greater family, legal, employment and other social-contextual challenges related to recovery than other groups. Substance use treatments that address both substance use and social-contextual factors are uniquely positioned to address these substance-related problems and produce more sustainable improvements in social functioning than treatment as usual (TAU) or behavioral controls (Control). The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in substance-related problems among Black adults, focusing on the comparative effectiveness between social-contextual treatments and TAU/Control.

Design: Individual-level data synthesis based on secondary analysis of Black adults enrolled in the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Clinical Trials Network (CTN).

Setting: All data were collected in the primary studies between 2001 and 2008 at clinics across the United States.

Participants: Black adults who reported cocaine and/or opioid use across nine studies within the NIDA CTN. The sample used herein consisted of individuals from five of these studies who provided data on substance-related problems (n=532; mean age=39.34; standard deviation=9.6).

Measurements: There were two treatment conditions: Social-contextual (e.g. Motivational Interviewing, Seeking Safety, STAGE 12) and TAU/Control. Moderated nonlinear factor analysis estimated latent scores for substance-related problems, using subscales from the Addiction Severity Index, while accounting for measurement noninvariance across studies, time and covariates. Linear mixed models estimated latent score differences over time between social-contextual treatments and TAU/Control during treatment and from the end of treatment through 12-month follow-up.

Findings: Both treatment groups improved across substance-related problem areas from baseline to the end-of-treatment (Cohen’s d = -0.10 to d = -0.47), with effects maintained at 12-month follow-up. Although social-contextual treatments did not statistically significantly outperform TAU/Control from baseline to end-of-treatment, they showed greater effects from end of treatment to 12-month follow-up in family/social [Cohen’s d difference ( d) = -0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.57 to -0.38], legal ( d = -0.20, 95% CI = -0.31 to -0.10) and psychiatric problems ( d = 0.29, 95% CI = -0.38 to -0.20) than TAU/Control. Sensitivity analyses indicated that Seeking Safety and STAGE 12 predominantly drove post-treatment improvements in family/social problems.

Conclusions: Substance use treatment may yield broader, delayed benefits beyond substance use reduction among Black adults in the United States. Compared with treatment-as-usual, social-contextual treatments can yield more sustainable effects in legal, family and psychiatric areas among Black adults, with interventions such as Seeking Safety and STAGE 12 showing particular benefits in addressing family-related challenges.

Related protocols: CTN-0125

Background and aim: Extended-release injectable naltrexone (XR-Naltrexone) is an effective treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD); however, initiation can be challenging as it requires an opioid-free period. This exploratory analysis examines patient characteristics associated with successful initiation of XR-Naltrexone in the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN-0051) Extended-Release Naltrexone versus Buprenorphine for Opioid Treatment (X:BOT) trial.

Methods: Patient demographics and clinical variables associated with successful XR-Naltrexone initiation were examined among 283 participants with OUD randomized to XR-Naltrexone in the X:BOT trial. Variables included severity of opioid use, characteristics of opioid and other substance use, treatment history, psychiatric history, baseline depression, and pain. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the effect of variables on the odds of induction success.

Results: 204 (72%) of 283 participants randomized to receive XR-Naltrexone completed successful induction. Housing status and pain were significantly associated with XR-Naltrexone induction status. Reported homelessness was significantly associated with higher odds of successful XR-Naltrexone induction (OR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.12, 4.76). Individuals that reported moderate or extreme pain on the EuroQoL had half the odds of successful induction compared to those without pain (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.27, 0.89).

Conclusions: Among patients with OUD initiating treatment on inpatient units, homelessness was associated with greater likelihood of successfully initiating XR-Naltrexone, while chronic pain was associated with lower likelihood of XR-Naltrexone initiation. Future research on XR-Naltrexone initiation should consider tailoring treatment based on housing status and other social determinants, and evaluation and management of pain.

Related protocols: CTN-0051

Background: Rural communities continue to experience high overdose mortality rates and challenges retaining individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) on medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). The most recent formulation of injectable extended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP) may improve treatment engagement and outcomes for people with OUD.

Objectives: The RXR study (CTN-0102-XR) aims to evaluate the feasibility of implementing XR-BUP in rural settings, acceptability of XR-BUP to clinic staff and patients, and effectiveness of XR-BUP compared with sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone (SL-BUP).

Study design and methods: This is an open-label randomized controlled trial (RCT) using intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Approximately 144 participants recruited from seven rural clinic sites will be randomized to receive XR-BUP or SL-BUP in a ratio of 2:1, and will receive study medication for 14 weeks. Participants in the XR-BUP condition will receive two weekly initiation dosages, followed by the target monthly dosage (128 mg) at Weeks 2, 6, and 10. Participants in the SL-BUP condition will receive medication on a similar schedule, with a target dose range of 16-24 mg/day. The main comparative effectiveness outcome measure is the number of monthly opioid negative urine drug screens (UDS) for non-prescribed opioids from Weeks 2-14. Feasibility and acceptability will be evaluated using mixed methods, combining participant survey and interview data from clinic administrators, providers, and patients.

Conclusions: If demonstrated to be feasible and acceptable to participants and staff and there is evidence of effectiveness for people with OUD in reducing opioid use, XR-BUP may be considered an important option for addressing OUD in rural settings.

Related protocols: CTN-0102-XR

Background and aims: Sleep disruptions increase the risk of substance misuse. Substance use-especially stimulants-can increase acute and chronic sleep dysfunction. This study aimed to estimate the associations between sleep disturbance and stimulant use over time among participants with stimulant use disorder (StUD).

Design: In this secondary analysis, a Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model (RI-CLPM) was used to assess sleep disturbance and stimulant use over 8 weeks among participants with StUD.

Setting: United States of America.

Participants: The analysis included 793 participants with StUD enrolled across 3 randomized controlled trials in the National Institute on Drug Abuse’s Clinical Trials Network (CTN): CTN-0037, CTN-0048 and CTN-0068.

Measurements: Self-reported sleep disturbance was harmonized as a binary indicator across trial measures at each week. Stimulant use days per week were captured by Timeline Follow Back. Baseline covariates included age, sex, race/ethnicity, employment status, presence of depressive symptoms, any psychiatric history, treatment arm and trial.

Findings: Sleep disturbance was associated with a higher average number of stimulant use days the following week [β = 0.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.09, 0.22, P < 0.001], and greater stimulant use was linked to increased odds of subsequent sleep disturbance (odds ratio = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.14, 1.26, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Higher-than-usual stimulant use appears to be associated with increased likelihood of sleep disturbance the following week, and vice versa.

Related protocols: CTN-0037, CTN-0048, CTN-0068

Importance: Hospital-based opioid treatment (HBOT) can improve outcomes for patients with opioid use disorder, but little is known about specific attributes and supports needed for clinical champions to successfully implement HBOT.

Objective: To identify characteristics and supports of effective clinical champions implementing HBOT in US hospitals.

Design, setting, and participants: Qualitative study using postimplementation semistructured interviews conducted with individuals highly involved in HBOT implementation, including champions and hospital staff at 12 US community hospitals randomized to the high-intensity group of the Exemplar Hospital Initiation Trial to Enhance Treatment Engagement, a national implementation trial comparing low- and high-intensity HBOT implementation strategies. Interviews explored implementation experiences over 24 months from December 2021 to December 2023. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and coded. The framework method and in-depth thematic analysis were used to explore the role of champions.

Interventions: All hospitals received a best-practices manual, video webinar series, and hub team support for questions, while hospitals randomized to the high-intensity group also received monthly practice facilitation, telementoring, and 10% effort funding for a local champion. Champions led HBOT implementation with support from regional hubs with HBOT expertise.

Measures: Effective champions were defined as those perceived by staff to successfully lead HBOT implementation. Open-ended questions and thematic analysis explored participants’ perspectives on attributes of effective champions and how they overcame implementation barriers.

Results: A total of 31 hospital staff (15 physicians, 5 executives, 5 pharmacists, 2 nurse practitioners, 2 social workers, 1 nurse, and 1 addiction counselor) were interviewed. Effective champions were perceived as respected hospital “insiders” with institutional influence, persistence, and systems change skills. They built multidisciplinary teams, developed standard workflows, and used emotionally resonant strategies (eg, patient narratives) to overcome stigma and engage hospital leadership. Champions could be effective without addiction medicine expertise, particularly when provided with protected time, hospital leadership support, and external practice facilitation from addiction experts.

Conclusions and relevance: This multisite qualitative study underscores the vital role of champions in expanding hospital-based opioid care. To ensure HBOT expansion, hospitals should invest in champions, protected time, leadership backing, and external supports that legitimize and routinize evidence-based addiction care.

Related protocols: CTN-0098