Search the Library

Purpose: Emergency Departments (ED) are important settings for initiating care following a non-fatal opioid overdose (NFOO). While ED-based interventions, including peer-led recovery support and initiation of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), are promising methods for reducing subsequent overdoses and mortality, randomized trials of ED-based overdose prevention or treatment- linkage interventions demonstrate that a substantial proportion of patients decline participation. The current secondary analysis is designed to characterize individuals who declined to participate in one such study.

Methods: Data were used from the Peer Intervention to Link Overdose Survivors to Treatment (PILOT) trial (CTN-0107), which was a multi-site study conducted in three US-based EDs that randomized participants to a 6-month peer-led overdose prevention intervention or treatment as usual in the ED. Demographics and clinical characteristics of those enrolled in PILOT (n = 150) were compared to those who declined to participate but completed a screening exit survey (ScrES; n = 46).

Results: Among those who declined study participation, 76% had experienced a prior overdose preceding the current overdose that brought them into the ED (58.7% within the past 72 h), 56.5% were not currently engaged in substance use treatment and among those, 65.4% expressed a desire for treatment. Odds of declining study participation decreased with age by 6% per year (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.9, 0.99); those with any college experience had odds of declining at 3 times greater than those without a high school diploma (OR = 3.4, 95% CI: 1.2, 10.1). Those without health insurance had odds of declining nearly 3 times those with insurance (OR = 2.9, 95% CI: 1.2, 7.0). Frequently cited reasons for declining were a desire to leave the ED or feeling unwell (39.1%), lack of interest in research (30.4%) and a belief the intervention would not be helpful (17.4%).

Conclusions: Results from this analysis characterize ED patients declining to participate in peer-led overdose prevention research with the goals of enhancing future recruitment strategies and enrolling more representative samples to reduce subsequent overdoses. Future work is needed to determine how to better engage priority populations at critical touch points, while ensuring that interventions are flexible, patient-centered, and potentially offer remote access.

Related protocols: CTN-0107

Background: The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Clinical Trials Network (CTN) has supported clinical trials of substance use disorder (SUD) interventions for 25 years. This review describes the use of implementation outcomes across CTN trials, characterizes outcomes included, and identifies gaps and potential opportunities to strengthen implementation research within the CTN and the field of SUD treatment.

Methods: This systematic review included active or completed studies listed on the CTN Dissemination Library webpage as of August 18, 2021, and approved by the CTN for development by January 1, 2022. Study summaries and protocols were reviewed if they: 1) measured at least one implementation outcome and 2) examined a practice change, intervention, or process. Extracted data elements included trial design characteristics, implementation frameworks, and outcome assessment domains informed by the RE-AIM and Proctor Implementation Outcomes Frameworks.

Results: 114 protocols were considered, 42 full-text protocols were screened, and 25 were included for data extraction. Start dates of trials spanned a 20-year period (2004–2024) with latter studies including more implementation outcomes. Fidelity (n = 29) and reach/penetration (n = 26) were the most included implementation outcomes. Equity was not identified in any protocols. Methods of defining, capturing, and evaluating outcomes data varied across trials and outcomes.

Conclusions: The inclusion of implementation outcomes increased over time, perhaps reflecting a growing emphasis on implementation research. Incorporating measures of equity could advance knowledge about differential receipt or effectiveness of SUD interventions. Future research should seek to improve the consistency and comprehensiveness in descriptions of implementation science elements.

Related protocols: CTN-0016, CTN-0056, CTN-0062-Ot, CTN-0064, CTN-0065, CTN-0069, CTN-0074, CTN-0074-A-1, CTN-0075, CTN-0076-Ot, CTN-0079, CTN-0079-A-1, CTN-0088, CTN-0090, CTN-0091, CTN-0095, CTN-0096, CTN-0097, CTN-0098, CTN-0099, CTN-0102, CTN-0103, CTN-0107, CTN-0116, CTN-0121

This manual for the Peer Intervention to Link Overdose Survivors to Treatment (PILOT) trial, CTN-0107, was prepared for use by peers working on the protocol. The intent of the manual is to provide materials to be used during peer training, reference materials to be used during the implementation of the clinical trial, and reference material for supervision. At the end of the study, the manual will be revised with input from participating peers and a revised manual will be developed for use in any follow-up studies.

The manual contains sections on the background of the PILOT study and intervention, what PILOT peers do in the study (engagement/re-engagement, peer coaching, transition and termination of the intervention), other things peers know and do in the PILOT study (study documentation, supervision, self-care and support, safety), and an array of tools and FAQs for peer participants.

Related protocols: CTN-0107

The increase in opioid-related overdoses has caused a decrease in average life expectancy, highlighting the need for effective interventions to reduce overdose risk and prevent subsequent overdoses. Peer support specialists (PSSs) offer an appealing strategy to engage overdose survivors and reduce overdose risk, but randomized controlled trials are needed to formalize peer-led interventions and evaluate their effectiveness.

Objective: This National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network (CTN) study is a multisite, prospective, pilot randomized (1:1) controlled trial (CTN protocol 0107) that aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an emergency department (ED)–initiated, peer-delivered intervention tailored for opioid overdose survivors (Peer Intervention to Link Overdose survivors to Treatment [PILOT]), compared with treatment as usual (TAU).

Methods: This study evaluates the effectiveness of the 6-month, PSS-led PILOT intervention compared with TAU on the primary outcome of reducing overdose risk behavior 6 months after enrollment. Adults (aged =18 years; N=150) with a recent opioid-related overdose were identified and approached in the ED. Participants were screened and enrolled, either in the ED or within 7 days of ED discharge at research offices or in the community and then asked to complete study visits at months 1, 3, 6 (end of intervention), and 7 (follow-up). Participants were enrolled at 3 study sites in the United States: Greenville, South Carolina; Youngstown, Ohio; and Everett, Washington. Participants randomized to the PILOT intervention received a 6-month, PSS-led intervention tailored to each participant’s goals to reduce their overdose risk behavior (eg, overdose harm reduction, housing, medical, and substance use treatment or recovery goals). Participants randomized to TAU received standard-of-care overdose materials, education, and services provided through the participating EDs. This paper describes the study protocol and procedures, explains the design and inclusion and exclusion decisions, and provides details of the peer-led PILOT intervention and supervision of PILOT PSSs.

Results: Study enrollment opened in December 2021 and was closed in July 2023. A total of 150 participants across 3 sites were enrolled in the study, meeting the proposed sample size for the trial. Primary and secondary analyses are underway and expected to be published in early 2025.

Conclusions: There is an urgent need to better understand the characteristics of overdose survivors presenting to the ED and for rigorous trials evaluating the effectiveness of PSS-led interventions on engaging overdose survivors and reducing overdose risk. Results from this pilot randomized controlled trial will provide a description of the characteristics of overdose survivors presenting to the ED; outline the implementation of PSS services research in ED settings, including PSS implementation of PSS supervision and activity tracking; and inform ED-initiated PSS-led overdose risk reduction interventions and future research to better understand the implementation and efficacy of these interventions.

Related protocols: CTN-0107

Emergency departments (ED) are incorporating Peer Support Specialists (PSSs) to help with patient care for substance use disorders (SUDs). Despite rapid growth in this area, little is published regarding workflow, expectations of the peer role, and core components of the PSS intervention. This study describes these elements in a national sample of ED-based peer support intervention programs.

A survey was conducted to assess PSS site characteristics as part of site selection process for a National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Clinical Trials Network (CTN) study evaluating PSS effectiveness (CTN-0107). Surveys were distributed to clinical sites affiliated with the 16 CTN nodes. Surveys were completed by a representative(s) of the site and collected data on the PSS role in the ED including details regarding funding and certification, services rendered, role in medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and naloxone distribution, and factors impacting implementation and maintenance of ED PSS programs. Quantitative data was summarized with descriptive statistics. Free-text fields were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

A total of 11 surveys were completed, collected from 9 different states. ED PSS funding was from grants (55%), hospital funds (46%), peer recovery organizations (27%) or other (18%). Funding was anticipated to continue for a mean of 16 months (range 12 to 36 months). The majority of programs provided “general recovery support (81%) Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) services (55%), and assisted with naloxone distribution to ED patients (64%). A minority assisted with ED-initiated buprenorphine (EDIB) programs (27%). Most (91%) provided services to patients after they were discharged from the ED. Barriers to implementation included lack of outpatient referral sources, barriers to initiating MOUD, stigma at the clinician and system level, and lack of ongoing PSS availability due to short-term grant funding.

Conclusions: The majority of ED-based PSSs were funded through time-limited grants, and short-term grant funding was identified as a barrier for ED PSS programs. There was consistency among sites in the involvement of PSSs in facilitation of transitions of SUD care, coordination of follow-up after ED discharge, and PSS involvement in naloxone distribution.

Related protocols: CTN-0107

This 90-minute session featured a range of presenters talking about peer support and intervention. [View agenda.]

Presentations included:

• A Primer on Peer Helpers and Addiction: Keith Humphreys, PhD [download slides]
• Peer Intervention to Link Overdose Survivors to Treatment (PILOT, CTN-0107): Kelly Barth, DO [download slides]
• HIV Prevention Trials Network 094 Study INTEGRA: A Vanguard Study of Health Service Delivery in a Mobile Health Delivery Unit: Steve Shoptaw, PhD [download slides]
• Oregon HOPE: A Community Peer Recovery Support Specialist Model for Engaging Rural People Who Use Drugs – P. Todd Korthuis, MD, MPH [download slides]

The session ended with a panel discussion featuring Dr. Korthuis as well as Pete Smith, Joanna Cooper, and Louise Haynes, MSW.

Related protocols: CTN-0107