Search the Library
NOTE: This is a new search platform (as of May 2026). If you do a search and don’t get the results you were expecting, please email us at ctnlib@uw.edu to let us know? (If possible, please share your exact search strategy. Thank you!)
Enter keywords and hit Enter (or click the magnifying glass) to search. You can then also select document type or subject/topic to narrow results further (or just use those for searching without a keyword). Results display below this search form.
Document types
Subjects
- CTN-#### format for protocols (CTN-0001, e.g.)
- “exact phrase” (if phrase is not found, it will return results that contain all terms
- word1 NOT word2
- word1 word2 (finds both words)
- Click title to access full-text
- “Show details” reveals abstract & other info
- Checkboxes select items for copy/pasting or printing
- Need help getting a copy of a journal article?
Email ctnlib@uw.edu
Search results
Black women are at heightened risk for trauma exposure, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and substance use disorders (SUDs) compared to white women and the general population. However, disparities in treatment engagement and retention persist, particularly for Black women with co-occurring PTSD and SUD. Although therapeutic alliance is an important predictor and mediator of treatment retention and outcomes, we know little about predictors of alliance and the mediating role of alliance for PTSD+SUD outcomes among Black women.
This study used data previously collected for the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) Women and Trauma Study (CTN-0015), which compared Seeking Safety (a cognitive-behavioral intervention for PTSD+SUD) to Women’s Health Education (control). It includes 88 Black/African American women from both arms of the original trial. Measures included the Helping Alliance Questionnaire, Addiction Severity Index-Lite, and Clinician Administered PTSD Scale. Women in the intervention arm also completed the Seeking Safety Feedback Questionnaire.
Stepwise, hierarchical linear regressions indicted that years of education and previous alcohol/drug treatment attempts significantly predicted early alliance in the second week of therapy, but not late alliance in the last week of therapy. Greater education and more treatment attempts were associated with higher early alliance. Alliance did not mediate relationships between these significant predictors and treatment outcomes (e.g., attendance, post-treatment PTSD and SUD symptoms) or treatment feedback in the Seeking Safety group.
Conclusions: Education and prior treatment attempts predicted early alliance among Black/African American women in PTSD+SUD group treatment, and higher education level was associated with poorer Seeking Safety feedback topic ratings. Educational level and treatment history should be considered during alliance building in therapeutic interventions with Black women. Clinicians may consider the integration of pre-treatment alliance-building strategies with Black female patients who have lower levels of education. This study provides insight into the relative impact of several important factors that influence early alliance among Black women with co-occurring PTSD and SUD.
Related protocols: CTN-0015
The co-occurrence of substance use disorders (SUD) and trauma-exposure is a risk factor for suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STB). However, traditional methods of measurement for suicidal thoughts and behaviors are limited by an overreliance on dichotomous (i.e., yes or no) and averaged/summed scale score measurements. Further, among trauma-exposed individuals with SUD, it remains unclear which specific demographic factors, types of SUDs, and trauma sequelae (e.g., posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD] symptom clusters) may be associated with elevated STB.
The present study utilized item response theory to (a) generate empirically derived STB severity scores and, (b) examine which demographic factors, SUD diagnoses, and DSM-IV PTSD symptom clusters are associated with suicidality in a trauma-exposed sample with SUDs.
Female trauma-exposed participants with SUDs (N=544) were recruited from community substance use treatment facilities in the NIDA Clinical Trials Network (CTN). Clinician-administered interviews assessed STB, SUDs, and PTSD symptoms.
Results indicated that the unidimensional item response theory (IRT) model used to estimate latent STB severity scores fit well, with strong local reliability and higher levels of latent STB severity. Regression predictors of elevated STB severity included younger age, opioid dependence, and higher PTSD reexperiencing symptoms.
Conclusions: Despite the critical importance of understanding, assessing, and identifying STB in trauma-exposed populations with SUDs, research methodologies that measure these variables are limited. This study used an innovative statistical analytic methodology to examine STB in a way that mirrors the weighting of various factors in suicide risk assessment. The findings highlight that trauma-exposed women with substance dependence who are younger, have opioid dependence, and/or have higher reexperiencing symptoms may warrant focused suicide risk assessment and management strategies. Clinicians are advised to screen for and target opioid use disorders and reexperiencing symptoms when addressing suicidal thoughts and behavior in trauma-exposed individuals with SUDs. Future work to elucidate the mechanisms through which these relationships operate would be beneficial.
Research studies suggest racial/ethnic differences in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis and symptom severity. Few studies to date, however, have examined the extent to which these findings are due to differences in measurement properties of existing PTSD scales. This study examined measurement equivalence across race/ethnicity in the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) by testing for differential item functioning (DIF) in the item response theory (IRT) framework.
Participants were 506 trauma-exposed women (M=39.41 years), who participated in the NIDA Clinical Trials Network Women and Trauma study (CTN-0015). PTSD severity score estimates were improved upon as part of IRT estimation incorporating symptom “weights” (i.e., factor loadings) and group-specific DIF. Six symptoms from the CAPS showed DIF, with the majority of differences in measurement driven by White/African Americans and White/Latina differences, particularly for (a) avoidance of thoughts and (b) a sense of foreshortened future. Despite both racial/ethnic minority groups being slight (not significantly) more likely to receive a PTSD diagnosis, African Americans and Latinas had significantly lower PTSD severity scores than Whites as estimated under IRT with group-specific DIF. Examination of PTSD severity scores based on symptom counts revealed these differences were either dampened or entirely negated.
Conclusions: These findings suggest the importance of considering differences in symptom relevance across race/ethnicity and their impact on capturing symptom severity parallel to diagnostic criteria. Implications for clinical practice are discussed.
Related protocols: CTN-0015
Most of the work on understanding subthreshold PTSD has focused on inconsistencies in defining subthreshold PTSD and how those inconsistencies impact prevalence rates. The present study distinguishes between full and subthreshold PTSD using empirical categorization and assesses the circumstances under which empirical categorization is discordant with full and subthreshold PTSD diagnoses.
Using data from the NIDA Clinical Trials Network protocol “Women’s Treatment for Trauma and Substance Use Disorders” (CTN-0015), researched used a modernized adaptation of the Jacobson and Truax (1991) framework, assessing whether patients were above or below an empirical threshold on latent PTSD severity scores estimated under categorical confirmatory factor analysis; the empirical categorizations were then crossed with the diagnosis to form four diagnostic by empirical categorization groupings.
Compared to a reference group (full PTSD diagnosis and empirical categorization), patients who had a full PTSD diagnosis but a subthreshold empirical categorization had lower symptom endorsement rates on 15 PTSD symptoms, were more likely to be married, ethnic minorities with fewer lifetime traumas. Conversely, patients with a subthreshold PTSD diagnosis and a full PTSD empirical grouping looked similar to “Full/Fulls,” only differing on avoidance symptoms.
Conclusions: Although alternative definitions of subthreshold PTSD and coding of symptom endorsement, as well as use of DSM-IV symptoms (though reconciled against overlapping symptoms from DSM-5), may impact results, these results suggest that empirical categorization can be a useful supplement to diagnosis in distinguishing subthreshold PTSD from full PTSD, using a methodology that could provide a platform for melding dimensional and categorical nosology approaches in the DSM.
Related protocols: CTN-0015
The “Women and Trauma” Study (WTS) conducted in the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN-0015) resulted in research publications, presentations, and a train-the-trainer workshop to support dissemination efforts for skills-based trauma treatment in substance use community treatment. Twelve years after its completion, this paper aims to examine whether and how the WTS contributed to knowledge in the field of trauma and addictions and inspired community treatment programs (CTPs) to train staff to identify and provide trauma-related services.
This article presents findings from two different analyses that explored longer-term study impacts on treatment and dissemination: (1) a post-study site survey covering 4 domains from 4/7 programs that participated in delivering the WTS to evaluate their perceptions of study impact on their treatment community; and (2) an analysis of citations of its publications to determine impact on the scientific community.
Surveys from responding sites indicated that participation in the study significantly increased their agencies” awareness of the need to take a focused approach to treating trauma issues in this population. Specifically, these sites increased their commitment to using skills-based trauma treatment with the study’s target population of female patients with SUD and trauma histories, as well as expanding it to other groups affected by trauma. Citation analysis revealed that according to the Web of Science, as of August 2019, the number of citations of 24 CTN-0015 articles, ranged from 1 to 135 (Mean = 20, SD = 33; Median = 6). Four of the most influential are discussed.
Conclusions: This article provides original information about the contributions of the WTS study, demonstrating how the study contributed to serving women with trauma in community substance use treatment.
Related protocols: CTN-0015
While the detrimental effects of concurrent substance use disorders (SUDs) are now being well documented, very few studies have examined this comorbidity among women with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Data for these analyses were derived from the “Women and Trauma” study conducted within the NIDA Clinical Trials Network. Women with full or subthreshold PTSD and co-occurring cannabis use disorder (CUD) and cocaine use disorder (COD; N=99) were compared to their counterparts with co-occurring CUD only (N=26) and co-occurring COD only (N=161) on rates of trauma exposure, psychiatric disorders, psychosocial problems, and other substance use utilizing a set of multivariate logistic regressions. In models adjusted for age and race/ethnicity, women with PTSD and COD only were significantly older than their counterparts with CUD only and concurrent CUD+COD. Relative to those with CUD only, women with concurrent CUD+COD had higher odds of adult sexual assault. Relative to those with COD only, women with concurrent CUD+COD had higher odds of alcohol use disorder in the past 12 months. Finally, relative to those with CUD only, women with COD only had higher odds of ever being arrested/convicted and adult sexual assault.
Conclusions: The higher rates of adult sexual assault and alcohol use disorder among those with concurrent CUD+COD suggest the need for trauma-informed approaches that can response to the needs of this dually-diagnosed population. Moreover, the causal link between repeated traumatic stress exposure and polysubstance use requires further examination.
Related protocols: CTN-0015
Eating disorders (ED) and substance use disorders (SUD) commonly co-occur, especially in conjunction with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), yet little is known about ED and ED symptoms in women presenting to addiction treatment programs. This study examined the association between ED symptoms and substance use frequency and severity in a sample of women with a DSM IV diagnosis of current SUD and PTSD enrolled in SUD treatment. Participants were 122 women from four substance abuse treatment sites who participated in a multi-site clinical trial through NIDA’s Clinical Trials Network (CTN). The Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q), the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS), and the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) were administered at baseline and correlational analyses were performed. Variables that significantly correlated with EDE-Q total and subscale scores were entered into a linear regression analysis. Results found that scores on the EDE-Q Global scale, as well as the Eating Concern, Weight Concern, and Shape Concern subscales of the EDE-Q were significantly associated with Caucasian race/ethnicity, past 30 day opiate use, higher ASI Psychiatric Subscale score, and lower ASI Employment Subscale score.
Conclusions: Women in recovery from SUD and PTSD reported concerns about weight, shape, and eating at a higher rate than in the general US population of women. The finding that past 30 day opiate use was associated with EDE scores may indicate that opiates also play a substantial role in disordered eating symptoms. Though exploratory, these findings suggest that there may be a relationship between addiction severity, use of certain drugs of abuse, and eating disorder symptoms, particularly those involving weight and shape concerns in women with comorbid PTSD and SUD. Comprehensive and integrated treatment approaches need to be developed to address this complex but common comorbidity.
Related protocols: CTN-0015, CTN-0015-A-1
Comorbid psychiatric and substance use disorders are common and associated with poorer treatment engagement, retention, and outcomes. This study examines the presence of depressive symptoms and demographic and clinical correlates in a diverse sample of substance abuse treatment-seekers to better characterize patients with co-occurring depressive symptoms and substance use disorders and understand potential treatment needs. Baseline data from a randomized clinical effectiveness trial of a computer-assisted, web-delivered psychosocial intervention were analyzed (CTN-0044, Web Delivery of Evidence-Based, Psychosocial Treatment for Substance Use Disorders). Participants (N=507) were recruited from 10 geographically diverse outpatient drug treatment programs. Assessments included the self-report Patient Health Questionnaire, and measures of coping strategies, social functioning, physical health status, and substance use.
One-fifth (21%; n=106) of the sample screened positive for depression; those screening positive for depression were significantly more likely to screen positive for anxiety (66.9%) and PTSD (42.9%). After controlling for anxiety and PTSD symptoms, presence of depressive symptoms remained significantly associated with fewer coping strategies (p=.001), greater impairment in social adjustment (p<.001), and poorer health status (p<.001), but not to days of drug use in the last 90 days (p=.14).
Conclusions: Depression is a clinically significant problem among substance abusers and, in this study, patients who screened positive for depression were more likely to have co-occurring symptoms of anxiety and PTSD. Additionally, the presence of depressive symptoms was associated with fewer coping strategies and poorer social adjustment. Coping skills are a significant predictor of addiction outcomes and it may be especially important to screen for and enhance coping among depressed patients. Evidence-based interventions that target coping skills and global functioning among substance abusers with depressive symptoms may be important adjuncts to usual treatment. Understanding the factors that might affect outcomes is important for the planning and implementation of substance abuse treatment.
Related protocols: CTN-0044
Recent federal legislation and a renewed focus on integrative care models underscore the need for economical, effective, and science-based behavioral health care treatment. As such, maximizing the impact and reach of treatment research is of great concern. Behavioral health issues, including the frequent co-occurrence of substance use disorders (SUD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), are often complex, with a myriad of factors contributing to the success of interventions. Although treatment guides for comorbid SUD/PTSD exist, most patients continue to suffer symptoms following the prescribed treatment course. Further, the study of efficacious treatments has been hampered by methodological challenges (e.g., overreliance on “superiority” designs (i.e., designs structured to test whether or not one treatment statistically surpasses another in terms of effect sizes) and short term interventions). Secondary analyses of randomized controlled clinical trials offer potential benefits to enhance understanding of findings and increase the personalization of treatment.
This paper offers a description of the limits of randomized controlled trials as related to SUD/PTSD populations, highlights the benefits and potential pitfalls of secondary analytic techniques, and uses as a case example one of the largest effectiveness trials of behavioral treatment for co-occurring SUD/PTSD conducted within the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN). The paper concludes with implications of this secondary analytic approach to improve addiction researchers’ ability to identify best practices for community-based treatment of these disorders.
Conclusions: Innovative methods are needed to maximize the benefits of clinical studies and better support SUD/PTSD treatment options for both specialty and non-specialty healthcare settings. Given the continuing gap between research and practice, appropriately executed secondary analytic studies are an important step in addressing questions that have real-world value to community clinicians. Moving forward, planning for and description of secondary analyses in randomized trials should be given equal consideration and care to the primary outcome analysis.
Despite advances toward integration of care for women with co-occurring substance use disorder (SUD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), low abstinence rates following SUD/PTSD treatment remain the norm. The utility of investigating distinct substance use trajectories is a critical innovation in the detection and refining of effective interventions for this clinical population. The present study reanalyzed data from the largest randomized clinical trial to date for co-occurring SUD and PTSD in women (National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network protocol CTN-0015, “Women’s Treatment for Trauma and Substance Use Disorders”). Randomized participants (n=353) received one of two interventions in addition to treatment as usual for SUD: 1) trauma-informed integrative treatment for PTSD/SUD (Seeking Safety); or 2) an active control psychoeducation course on women’s health (Women’s Health Education).
The present study utilized latent growth mixture models (LGMM) with multiple groups to estimate women’s substance use patterns during the 12-month follow-up period. Findings provided support for three different trajectories of substance use in the post-treatment year: 1) consistently low likelihood and use frequency; 2) consistently high likelihood and use frequency; and 3) high likelihood and moderate use frequency. Covariate analyses revealed improvement in PTSD severity was associated with membership in a specific substance use trajectory, although receiving trauma-informed treatment was not. Additionally, SUD severity, age, and after-care efforts were shown to be related to trajectory membership.
Conclusions: Findings highlight the necessity of accounting for heterogeneity in post-treatment substance use, relevance of trauma-informed care in SUD recovery, and benefits of incorporating methodologies like LGMM when evaluating SUD treatment outcomes. For women dually diagnosed with PTSD and SUD, the current study established the presence of several varied clinical presentations linked to substance use following treatment, each with potentially different needs, vulnerabilities, and strengths. Results of this study also point to opportunities for tailing interventions to the specific clinical presentation and potential impact of these choices on a woman’s trajectory of recovery.
The high prevalence of trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs) presents a number of treatment challenges for community treatment providers and programs in the U.S. Although several evidence-based, integrated therapies for the treatment of comorbid PTSD/SUD have been developed, rates of utilization of such practices remain low in community treatment programs. The goal of this article was to review the extant literature on common barriers that prevent adoption and implementation of integrated treatments for PTSD/SUD among substance abuse community treatment programs. Organizational, provider-level and patient-level factors that drive practice decisions were discussed, including organizational philosophy of care policies, funding and resources, as well as provider and patient knowledge and attitudes related to implementation of new integrated treatments for comorbid PTSD as SUD.
Conclusions: Despite increasing awareness of the need to address comorbid PTSD and SUD, organization-, provider- and patient-level factors present challenges to the implementation of integrated therapies in front line community substance abuse treatment programs. Understanding and addressing these challenges may facilitate use of evidence-based integrated treatments for comorbid PTSD and SUD.
This secondary analysis of data from National Drug Abuse Institute Clinical Trials Network protocol CTN-0015, “Women’s Treatment for Trauma and Substance Use Disorders,” investigated the impact of 12 sessions of Seeking Safety (SS) on reducing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms in a sample of dually diagnosed women with physical disabilities versus nondisabled (ND) women. SS is an evidence-based and widely implemented manualized therapy for PTSD and/or substance use disorder. It is a present-focused model that promotes coping skills and psychoeducation. In CTN-0015, 353 participants with current PTSD and substance use disorder (SUD) were randomly assigned to partial-dose SS or Women’s Health Education (WHE) group therapy conducted in a community-based substance abuse treatment program. The women were categorized as participants with disabilities (PWD; n=20) or ND (n=333) based on the question, “Do you receive a pension for a physical disability?” PTSD was assessed with the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) at baseline and follow-ups after treatment (1 week, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months). PWD experienced sustained reductions in PTSD symptoms when treated with SS but not WHE. Indeed, PTSD symptoms of PWD in WHE returned to baseline levels of severity by 12-month follow-up. This pattern of results was not observed among ND women, who sustained improvements on PTSD in both treatment conditions.
Conclusions: These results suggest strong potential for using Seeking Safety to treat PTSD among women with physical disabilities, an intervention that may be particularly relevant for this population by providing a trauma focus without requiring clients to delve into painful traumatic memories and instead offering a present and optimistic focus on coping skills and education. This is a vulnerable population for whom trauma is bound up closely with disability; the finding here, that women with disabilities had better outcomes in the Seeking Safety group than the Women’s Health Education group, speaks to the genuine need to address trauma and PTSD more directly in those with disabilities.
Related protocols: CTN-0015
Given high drop-out rates and difficulties with retention among women in treatment for co-occurring post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorders (SUD), research to determine the specific conditions under which this population can best be engaged and benefit from treatment is important. This study examined the relationship between racial/ethnic match and treatment outcomes for 224 women who participated in a National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) study of group treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorders, “Women’s Treatment for Trauma and Substance Use Disorders” (CTN-0015). Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the effect of client-therapist racial/ethnic match on outcomes.
Results revealed racial/ethnic match was not significantly associated with session attendance. There was a significant three-way interaction between client race/ethnicity, baseline level of PTSD symptoms, and racial/ethnic match on PTSD outcomes. White clients, with severe PTSD symptoms at baseline, who attended treatment groups where they were matched with their therapist, had greater reductions in PTSD symptoms at follow-up than their counterparts who were racially/ethnically mismatched with their group therapist. Racial/ethnic match did not confer additional benefits for black clients in terms of PTSD outcomes. Racial/ethnic match interacted with baseline substance use to differentially influence substance use outcomes at follow-up for all women.
Conclusions: Overall, these findings revealed the complexity of racial/ethnic matching between client and therapist and its impact, particularly within a group treatment context. While racial/ethnic matching may provide, in some circumstances, a context that facilitates understanding, enhances trust, and strengthens the alliance; under other conditions, racial/ethnic matching may not confer additional benefits. These findings highlight the need for further examinations into individual and subgroup differences in the benefits of racial/ethnic matching.
Related protocols: CTN-0015
Individuals with substance use disorders are often plagued by psychiatric comorbidities and histories of physical and/or sexual trauma. Males and females, although different in their rates of expressed trauma and psychiatric symptomatology, experience comparable adverse consequences, including poorer substance abuse treatment outcomes, diminished psychosocial functioning, and severe employment problems. This study’s goal was to examine the relationships between trauma history, lifetime endorsement of psychiatric symptoms, and gender in a sample of individuals participating in outpatient substance abuse treatment.
Study participants (N=625) from six psychosocial counseling and five methadone maintenance programs were recruited as part of a larger study of an employment intervention conducted through the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN-0020, “Job Seekers Training for Patients with Drug Dependence”). Measures included lifetime trauma experience (yes/no), type of trauma experienced (sexual, physical, both), lifetime depression/anxiety, and lifetime suicidal thoughts/attempts (as measured by the Addiction Severity Index-Lite (ASI-Lite)). Lifetime endorsement of psychiatric symptoms was compared between individuals with and without trauma history. The role of gender was also examined. Results indicated that the experience of trauma was associated with an increase in lifetime report of psychiatric symptoms. Experience of physical and combined physical and sexual trauma consistently predicted positive report of psychiatric symptoms in both males and females, even when controlling for demographic and treatment-related variables. Employment outcomes, however, were not predicted by self-reported history of lifetime trauma.
Conclusions: Consistent with previous research, a substantial proportion of the study sample — nearly 50% — reported a lifetime history of physical and/or sexual victimization. Also not surprisingly, the hypothesis regarding gender differences in rates of abuse was also confirmed in this study, a finding consistent with prior research demonstrating that women with SUDs typically experience dramatically higher rates (2 times or greater) of lifetime physical and sexual trauma than men. That said, although rates of trauma in the current sample were higher for women, the severity of mental health symptoms was comparable in males and females, suggesting that the aftermath of trauma equally affects both sexes. These findings highlight the need for improved gender-specific trauma screening and intervention strategies, as well as future research on techniques to better identify and treat the overlooked population of men with trauma histories.
Related protocols: CTN-0020