Barriers to condom use: Results for men and women enrolled in HIV risk reduction trials in outpatient drug treatment.

HIV transmission often occurs through heterosexual high-risk sex. Even in the era of HIV combination prevention, promoting condom use and understanding barriers to consistent condom use remain priorities, especially among substance-dependent individuals.

This secondary analysis used data from CTN-0018 and CTN-0019, two NIDA Clinical Trials Network studies that compared a five-session gender-specific risk reduction group (Real Men Are Safe for men, Safer Sex Skills Building for women) to a one-session HIV Education Group for men and women (N=729) in outpatient drug treatment. Condom barriers (Motivation, Partner-Related, Access/Availability, Sexual Experience) were assessed at baseline and 6-month follow-up.

Intervention condition was not associated with condom barriers across any of the four domains; however, individuals who attended at least three of the five SSSB/REMAS sessions or the single session of HIV Education were more likely to report fewer motivation and partner-related barriers. Among women, reductions in motivation and sexual experience barriers were associated with less sexual risk with primary partners. For both men and women, reductions in partner-related barriers were associated with fewer unprotected vaginal/anal sex acts with primary partners.

Conclusions: Condom barriers are important to gender-specific HIV prevention; given limited resources, brief interventions maximizing active components are needed.

Related protocols: CTN-0018, CTN-0019

Categories: Condom use, CTN platform/ancillary study, Gender differences, Gender-specific interventions, HIV/AIDS, Real Men Are Safe (REMAS), Safer Sex Skills Building (SSSB), Sexual risk behavior, Sexually transmitted diseases
Tags: Article (Peer-Reviewed)
Authors: Campbell, Aimee N. C.; Brooks, Audrey J.; Pavlicova, Martina; Hu, Mei-Chen; Hatch-Maillette, Mary A.; Calsyn, Donald A.; Tross, Susan
PMCID: PMC5067067
PMID: 27766067
Source: Journal of HIV/AIDS & Social Services 2016;15(2):130-146. [doi: 10.1080/15381501.2016.1166090]